October 13, 2006, Matthew Cochrane, A Biblical Defense of Paedobaptism, Part 2: The Symbolism of Baptism

Our newborn son, James, will be baptized this SundayThe infant baptism debate goes much deeper than the question of whether it is proper and right to baptize babies. The heart of the question is the very definition of Christian baptism. What is it? What does it symbolize? What does it signify? What does it mean? Once these questions are fully and comprehensively answered, the matter of baptizing infants will be more easily settled.

 

What is baptism supposed to symbolize? Wayne Grudem, Research Professor of Bible and Theology at Phoenix Seminary, holds to the traditional Baptist view.  He believes baptism represents “the symbolism of union with Christ in his death, burial, and resurrection.” This view holds that all New Testament baptisms were carried out by the subject being put completely under water.  This mode of baptism is commonly called immersion.  Grudem, and most Baptists, believe support for this line of reasoning is found in two Scriptural passages:

 

Or do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His death? Therefore we were buried with Him through baptism into death, that just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. (Romans 6:3, 4)

 

and

 

…buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised with Him through faith in the working of God, ?who raised Him from the dead (Colossians 2:12)

 

 

Wayne Grudem comments on these two verses by stating:

 

Now this truth is clearly symbolized in baptism by immersion. When the candidate for baptism goes down into the water it is a picture of going down into the grave and being buried.  Coming up out of the water is then a picture of being raised with Christ to walk in newness of life.  Baptism thus very clearly pictures death to one’s old way of life and rising to a new kind of life in Christ.  But baptism by sprinkling or pouring simply misses this symbolism.

 

Traditionally, however, theologians have always maintained the above verses are not speaking of water baptism, but of spiritual baptism. As Louis Berkhof, the great theologian who taught for almost four decades at Calvin Theological Seminary, writes in his Systematic Theology:

 

…even these are not to the point, for they do not speak directly of any baptism with water at all, but of the spiritual baptism thereby represented.  They represent regeneration under the figure of a dying and a rising again. It is certainly perfectly obvious that they do not make mention of baptism as an emblem of Christ’s death and resurrection.  If baptism were represented here at all as an emblem, it would be an emblem of the believer’s dying and rising again.  And since this only a figurative way of representing his regeneration, it would make baptism a figure of a figure.

 

Traditional reformed theology holds a much different opinion on what baptism symbolizes.  The vast majority of Christian scholars since the death of Christ have held that Baptism signifies purification.  As the Heidelberg Catechism states:

 

Christ instituted this outward washing and with it gave the promise that, as surely as water washes away the dirt from the body, so certainly His blood and Spirit wash away the impurity of my soul, that is, all my sins.

 

Later it reads:

 

Is then the external baptism of water, the washing away of sins? It is not: For the blood of Jesus Christ alone cleanses us from all sin.  Why then does the Holy Spirit call baptism the washing of regeneration, and the washing away of sins? God speaks thus not without sufficient cause, not only that He may teach us, that just as pollution of the body is purged by water, so our sins are expiated by the blood and Spirit of Christ; but much more that He may assure us by this divine symbol and pledge, that we not less truly are cleansed from our sins by inward washing, than that we are purified by external and visible water.

 

Louis Berkhof writes:

 

This idea of purification was the pertinent thing in all the washings of the Old Testament, and also in the baptism of John, Ps. 51:7; Ezek. 36:25; John 3:25, 26.  And we may assume that in this respect the baptism of Jesus was entirely in line with previous baptisms.  If He had intended the baptism which He instituted as a symbol of something entirely different, He would have indicated this very clearly, in order to obviate all possible misunderstanding. Moreover, Scripture makes it abundantly clear that baptism symbolizes spiritual cleansing or purification…

 

Some of the New Testament passages that back up this historically orthodox view are:

 

Then Peter said to them, “Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. (Acts 2:38)

 

And now why are you waiting? Arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on the name of the Lord.  (Acts 22:16)

 

And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God. (I Cor. 6:11)

 

…not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit…   (Titus 3:5)

 

...let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water.   (Hebrews 10:22)

 

There is also an antitype which now saves us—baptism (not the removal of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God), through the resurrection of Jesus Christ… (I Peter 3:21)

 

...and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead, and the ruler over the kings of the earth.  To Him who loved us and washed us from our sins in His own blood…   (Revelation 1:5)

 

The washing, or purification, is exactly the thing the Bible repeatedly emphasizes while never portraying the descending and rising in baptism as essential. This is the point I am trying to make in this post.  I realize that I have touched on the subject of the proper mode for baptism, but that subject will be more fully examined in upcoming articles. For now, I merely wanted to show what baptism is meant to symbolize according to Scriptures.

 

Editor’s Note:  For the rest of this series please see: Part 1, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, and Part 8.

Comments
In many places in the middle east today and in the past, including 1st century Jerusalem, the way people are/were buried was by having rocks POURED on top of their body. So whether the above verses are talking about a literal baptism or a spiritual one, the mode is still not usually immersion. Even on the day of pentecost in Acts 2, the Holy Spirit is said to have been "poured" out on them. Here's a question. Baptists believe immersion is the only way to properly be baptized because they believe that's the example given to us in the new testament. If they are that caught up in the mode of one sacrament, how come they completely neglect the mode of the other one? Would a Baptist ever drink fermented wine in church during the Lord's supper? Jesus did. - Stephen the Presbyterian

One can get caught up in a lot of points here, Steve, so I will make this short and sweet. The word "baptize" is not a tranlation, but a transliteration of the word "baptizein"(sp) meaning "to immerse." To say Baptists baptize by immersion is a redundancy, since baptism originally was immersion. - Michelle the Presbytarian Baptist

not true. exactly how would you immerse a dining couch like mentioned in Mark 7:4? Baptists don’t believe immersion is the only way to properly baptize someone because they think the Greek word “baptizos” means immersion. It’s the other way around. They transliterate it to mean immersion because they think that’s the only single way to properly baptize someone. I also know Jesus wasn't immersed when he was baptized, however, that’s the blogger’s task to explain if he so desires. - Stephen "the walks in swingin" Presbyterian

And since when did you study Greek? (j/k ) Cups, pitchers, copper pots....dont see a dining couch, but maybe your Bible is different from mine. Cant research that right now but my NIV and NASB dont mention a couch. If I am wrong, I'll be sure and tell you though. You should also be interested to know that I have seen believers both poured and sprinkled in a Baptist church due to health restrictions. It's not the "only single way" as you put it. Yes, Baptists believe in a "believer's baptism" and choose immersion both because of the original meaning AND b/c it symbolizes the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, being buried with Christ and risen with Him as well. - Michelle the Christian

I actually do know a thing or two about the Greek. That's what friends in Seminary are for. And I don't know what translation you're using, but most (not all) of the manuscripts say dinging couches. As far as the believers who are physically impaired and can't be immersed, that's another reason to believe that, unlike baptists, God endorses more than one mode. If I get baptized at First Baptist Church and then transfer my membership to First Presbyterian Church, they will accept my baptist baptism as legitimate. But if I am baptized at First Presbyterian Church and then transfer my membership to First Baptist church, nine times out of ten they will make me be "scripturally" baptized before infiltrating their congregation. - Stephen "the label loving" Presbyterian

Of course the Presbytarian Church accepts the "Southern Baptist" baptism. They know it was done right. -

Of course the Presbytarian Church accepts the "Southern Baptist" baptism. They know it was done right. -

no one here denies that immersion is one legitimate way to baptize. Every example of baptism in scripture either demands sprinkling/pouring, or allows it; even the Baptism of Christ Himself. -

Besides, how do you immerse a baby - Stephen the "you know what"

Only reform bubbas would refer to the OT to figure out the mode of a NT ordinance; Didache group used immersion - cdl

CDL, should we ignore the first 2/3's of the Bible? - Russ

not if you know how to read and understand - cdl

Heb 1&2 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets...but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son...we must pay more careful attention, therefore, to what we have heard, so that we do not drift away...how shal we escape if we ignore such a great salvation?...which was first announced by the Lord. [so no need to revert to the obsolete Heb 6] - cdl

NIV footnote "some early manuscripts include dining couches"...what's a dining couch doing in the marketplace? - cdl

If you don't want to join a church that follows the clearer guidance in Bible rather than footnotes in current translations in it's ordinances such as believers baptism by immersion, then join some church other than So. Baptist for ex. Oh that's right Steph the Presby. You already did. About the wine though, I'll drink to that. - cdl

grape juice and infant baptismal water are both hard to swallow - cdl

of course mode is only important here to set the stage for baptizing infants without having to immerse them; it would be unceremonial to have a naked, wet infant unceremoniously kicking and screaming and squirting out of a paedobaptizer's grasp into the water to be fished out again - cdl

another thing about dining couches; they were a Roman custom and for the well to do; and they weren't pieces of upholstered furniture such as we have today. They were large, heavy solid stone "benches" with cushions or mattresses on top. Probably not in use by many Jews but if they were immersing or washing the bench or cushion, it would have been to make a big show of how dedicated a person was. Immersing a mattress would be a pretty good show. "He's so committed to the law that he even immerses his mattress." But still not much to bolster the position that baptize doesn't mean immerse even for a box spring baptist. - cdl - cdl


Comment:
Name:
Enter the letters:
©2009 Matthew Cochrane




Search:
Christianbook.com



Two ways to live: The choice we all face
Lookup a word or passage in the Bible



BibleGateway.com
Include this form on your page

Recent Activity:


Top 5 Posts of the Month:

Recently Viewed Posts:

Top Ten Most Commented

  1. A Biblical Defense of Paedobaptism, Part 8: Commonly Held Objections and Their Fallacies (378)


  2. Roe v. Wade: The 35th Anniversary of Legalized Abortion (147)


  3. In Defense of My Church and Pastor: A Followup (108)


  4. In Defense of My Church and Pastor: On the Recent Controversy Surrounding Tullian Tchividjian and Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church (106)


  5. A Biblical Defense of Paedobaptism, Part 3: The Proper Mode of Baptism (79)


  6. Friday Political Roundup VI: Thoughts on New Hampshire's Primary (Special Wednesday Edition) (78)


  7. Why I Like Mike, Part 2: Responding to the Conservative Establishment's Attacks (75)


  8. In Defense of My Church and Pastor: Congregational Meeting Announcement (69)


  9. From the Depths of the Web 2, June 2008 (65)


  10. Can the Church Compromise on Baptism? Part 1 (60)



Top Ten Hits All-Time

  1. Abortion, America's Greatest Sin, Part 4: Defining Personhood



  2. Supreme Court Upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban



  3. A Biblical Defense of Paedobaptism, Part 7: The Sign of the Covenant



  4. A Biblical Defense of Paedobaptism, Part 8: Commonly Held Objections and Their Fallacies



  5. Mentorship Program for Incarcerated Young Men Gives Christians Opportunity to Witness, Offer Guidance



  6. Abortion, America's Greatest Sin, Part 3: The Beginning of Life



  7. Book Review: Love and Respect



  8. Book Review: Velvet Elvis



  9. The True Meaning of Christmas: Wrath, Judgment, Hope, and Grace



  10. In Defense of My Church and Pastor: On the Recent Controversy Surrounding Tullian Tchividjian and Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church



Add your Feeds:


Add to My AOL Add to Google

Blogs I read:

Fave Five Religious and Cultural Friends and Family

See what my readers are saying…

“this website should be named NotConsistentThought or NotCompleteThought”

“I would say you are too sensitive”

“you just twist and spin”

“you just bloviate and pontificate”

“you are legalistic”